Al Qaeda plotters behind potential Christmas attack released from Guantanamo Bay

If you've watched the news lately you would've heard about the Muslim terrorist with explosive underwear who tried to blow up a Northwest flight from Amsterdam to Detroit on Christmas Day but only roasted his nuts. Well here's some news the lamestream media didn't tell you.

I did some research on the incident (and by research I mean reading around on the internet) and it turns out that, according to American officials and US Department of Defense documents, 2 of the 4 Al Qaeda leaders that planned the attempted bombing of Northwest Airlines Flight 253 were RELEASED FROM GUANTANAMO BAY in November 2007. Guantanamo prisoner #333, Muhamad al-Awfi (the terrorist formerly known as Muhamad Attik al-Harbi) and prisoner #372, Said Ali Shari, were released from Guantanamo Bay to Saudi Arabia on 9 November 2007. There they entered into an "art therapy rehabilitation programme" (whatever that means) and were later freed to plan this terrorist attack. Are you as outraged as I am? You should be. To make matters worse, both the Saudi nationals who planned this attack have emerged in leadership roles in Yemen.

So basically, these terrorist masterminds were sent to Saudi Arabia for some art classes to presumably encourage creating art instead of creating terrorism. One programme gives the former detainees paints and crayons as part of the rehabilitation regime. I guess they were asked to paint or draw creative ways to blow up a plane. You have to admit that hiding a bomb in your underwear is pretty crafty. We haven't seen this level of artistic talent since Richard Reid, the shoe bomber (maybe he's an alumni of the same terrorist art school). Maybe they should apply for a job at Victoria's Secret designing underwear that would make any guy explode in a different way if you get what I mean. But I digress. This so-called art therapy is supposed to rehabilitate terrorists into become creative artists but all it is doing is turning them into more creative terrorists. Even a US diplomat admits "the so-called rehabilitation programs are a joke." But Saudi officials claim that it helps terrorists return to a meaningful life. Yeah, if you count creative terrorism as a meaningful life! A similar rehabilitation programme in Yemen was stopped because the detainees quickly joined Al Qaeda or its affiliates. I've got an even better idea. Why not stop this whole art therapy nonsense and keep the terrorists in Guantanamo Bay? Even Saudi officials admit there have been failures (wow really?) but they still insist that overall it works. I've seen plenty of failures from these art classes but not a single success. Can someone provide me with even one example of a terrorist who attended one of these art therapy sessions and is no longer a terrorist but living a meaningful life? Just one example? Yeah, thought not. Yet these bleeding-heart liberals, who go on about how Guantanamo Bay is so tough on terrorists because they don't get all the luxuries, still insist that if we're nice to them and cater to all their needs then let them go that they'll be good little angels and leave us alone. This potential terrorist attack on Christmas Day has invalidated that theory.

Now you may have noticed that November 2007 was when George W Bush was still president. So you're probably thinking, "George Bush released the terrorists! It's all his fault. Now Obama has to fix it up." But before all you Bush bashers jump up down, remember he was only doing what you guys were begging him to do - close down Guantanamo Bay. I know it was Bush not Obama that released them (although Obama would've been even more enthusiastic about releasing them) so yes I'm blaming Bush for listening to these liberal jerks. But don't forget that one of Obama's main election promises was to close down Guantanamo Bay. George Bush may have released a few terrorists but Obama will continue to release the rest to cause more terrorism. This is what happens when George Bush listens to all these communist idiots. Amnesty International, the ACLU and all these other terrorist-loving liberals have blood on their hands. It's no use blaming him for something Obama would've happily done and is continuing to do. We can go on about Bush's failures but Obama is the president now and the buck stops with him. It's time to stop this useless art therapy and keep the terrorists in Guantanamo Bay where they can't do any harm. The policy of closing Guantanamo Bay should be reversed immediately. Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano's comment that the airport security system is working "very, very smoothly" is not only a lie but does nothing to reassure anyone. If President Barack Obama doesn't take stronger and more meaningful proper measures against terrorism, instead of politically correct nonsense and empty gestures, then the future these terrorists paint isn't a very pretty one.

Washington State bans Christmas - Christians persecuted not just in Muslim countries

No this is not a joke. If you thought you were safe from the ongoing politically correct War on Christmas just because you live in a so-called free country and not Iran or Afghanistan then keep reading.

Persecution of Christians in those countries and others like North Korea or China isn't exactly news but now the war on Christianity has spread to the so-called Land of the Free. Thanks to protests from stupid atheist groups who should mind their own business, such as The Freedom from Religion Foundation, Washington state Governor Chris Gregoire has banned Christmas displays from the state capitol building in Olympia. The ban, which has been in effect since 1 December, means it is illegal to celebrate a Christian holiday and if you do you'll go to jail. You can't have any displays of religion especially nativity scenes because that would offend non-christians such as Muslims and atheists who should get a life. Christmas trees have to be called Holiday trees because stifling one religion in favour of others is what counts as tolerance these days.

Liberals are always going on about tolerance and how we should respect diversity. But apparently, this doesn't apply to Christians. They go on about the non-existent separation of church and state but forget that it's not mentioned even once in the constitution. All the constitution says is that the government can't set up a state-run church. It doesn't say anything about banning Christianity or Christmas. So, in other words, banning Christmas is actually a violation of the constitutional right to freedom of religion. But these are Christians we're talking about not Muslims so, to the politically correct bureaucrats who think they know best, it doesn't matter if they get offended. They would bend down to appease any minority group that demands special treatment such as Muslims but, although all religions are equal, it seems Christians are less equal than others. It's ironic that liberals who are always against Christians spreading their religion are quite happy to ram their's down our throats - especially man-made climate change. Why can't you harmlessly spread the gospel of salvation through Jesus Christ but you can ram the religion of man-made climate change down people's throats? Notice how the media always only reports on the chicken little side of the global warming debate. That's because the leftists who control it have their own anti-Christian agenda and want to ram their religion down your throats yet claim that Christians are the ones who are intolerant and imposing their views on others. Liberal atheists who hate freedom want to take the Christ out of Christmas. They've already succeeded in Washington State and it won't be long before Christmas is banned in New Zealand. Christians and Non-Christians who care about freedom need to fight back against the anti-Christian agenda. Don't think that just because Helen Clark is gone that Christians are safe. The agnostic John Key has already refused the biblical right for parents to smack their kids for correction. He could just as easily ban Christmas and persecute Christians. National and Labour are just two sides of the same anti-Christian coin. We can start fighting against the politically onslaught by putting the Christ back into Christmas and telling overly sensitive atheists, Muslims and other minorities where to shove it.

Merry CHRISTmas! Yes I said Christmas not the Holidays or Season Greetings or Winterval or whatever. Got a problem with that? Tough!